ABDUL SATTAR versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT, ISLAMABAD
Article 199 High Court Scope Electric Supply Corporation Assistant Lineman's Constitutional Jurisdiction, Interviewing and Qualifying for such Post Posting not to issue an appointment letter to the applicant shows that the applicant was eligible An Interview Call Letter was issued in which he was released. The effect would be that mere participation in the interview would not create a sign of truth. Article 200 of the Constitution referred to the High Court two years after its interview without explaining the delay, and this would depend on the existence of a fundamental or legal right of a person. The infringing person must have the right to be legally entitled to any relief under the law, rules or regulations that the applicants failed to establish in any such right There was no place to request the High Court constitutional jurisdiction. Violations by the Authority's High Court, in the circumstances, dismissed the constitutional application
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
