BIBI HANIFA versus DR. JAMILA GYNAECOLOGIST, CIVIL HOSPITAL PISHIN
Section 7 337H Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 (2) Leave to appeal against acquittal by injury through acts of theft or negligence, complainant's refusal to delay the Lady Doctor's nine-month unexpected delay. After the private complaint was launched who actually did the operation. There was no accused in the row of the complainant as the present accused was operating under the aforesaid lady doctor during the operation, which was successfully performed with the consent of the complainant's husband and the presence of the complainant in the complainant's stomach. And his recovery was never brought to the scene during the inquiry process or before the trial court, or for a specific period before the trial court said that he was bleeding. The complainant was placed in the abdomen, but the complainant left the hospital without medical permission. Of respondents, therefore, can not blame a stomach complaint are sufficient to leave the trial court had acquitted the accused on the basis of strong reasons, which were neither perverse nor undeviating
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
