Sections 302 (b) and 337f (iii) of Qatil Amad, which defined the testimony of informed mah, were the only victims of the alleged incident; but it was also an independent witness, with no suspicion or ill will with the accused witness By the time he had fully supported the prosecution's version and had told a straightforward and faith-inspiring story, and despite a lengthy cross-examination, no item was brought on record to remain in his office. Their fact, except for a few minor contradictions, cannot be doubted by the presence of witnesses on occasion at the time of their statements not affecting the intrinsic value of the defense in establishing the substitution of the accused in place of the real culprits. Was unsuccessful. That the FIR was filed immediately, in which the accused was named, it showed that the complainant had described the incident truthfully, the immediate registration of the FIR proved that Before filing an FIR, there was no discussion or no time available. To present this story to the complainant, the ocular account presented by the witnesses of the accused identified in the light of day was not possible, there was no material contradiction, contradiction or material weakness, the same was the medical evidence. And the recovery of the criminal weapons was also supported, that is, the prosecution witnesses of the pistol and its positive report from the occupation of the accused, although close to the victim's relatives, could not be termed an interesting witness because of their direct hatred. Was not the one who was subjected to the fatal injury in the prosecution, in these circumstances the accused NK
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
