PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY versus RASHEED A. RIZVI
R 5 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 138 175, 1993, 203, 242 Judiciary, Appointment of Separation of Powers, Notification Principle of 4 12 2008, Sindh Public Service Commission played an important and domineering role in judicial service justification in the recruitment of judges. The appointment process in the judiciary must be examined through constitutional principles such as the rule of separation of powers. The notification, which had stripped the power of election from the High Court and handed it over to the Sindh Public Service Commission, which did not meet the constitutional standard, became part of it. The effect of the appointment of Judicial Officers through a notification was the result of ignoring the independence of the judiciary and the separation of powers contemplated in Articles 175 and 203 of the Constitution, as the High Court was neither involved in the selection of judges nor The previous task in his appointment was to be performed by the Sindh Public Service Commission and after the Sindh Government Sindh Public Service Commission, some of the duties of the provincial government of Sindh were assigned by law under Article 138 of the Constitution. Were properly understood by the High Court as the Executive Authority Commission made an executive statement B was doing so and not because he was appointed to the judicial appointments, but when he was part of the executive branch, he was given some degree of autonomy by the political executive for efficient payment of his duties. Where the executive had illegally imposed such sovereignty. In a particular circumstance, its remedy was to act or do better than to disqualify an executive body, rather than to reform a particular situation under Article 199 of the Constitution.
