SUO MOTU ACTION REGARDING ALLEGATION OF BUSINESS DEAL BETWEEN MALIK RIAZ HUSSAIN AND DR. ARSALAN IFT versus
Articles 184 (3) and 19A by the Supreme Court under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution to affect the judicial process relating to the allegation of a business agreement between the son of an automotive businessman and a serving Chief Justice of Pakistan. Keeping up the issue of public importance The right to information about issues of public importance Scope of self-notice by stopping unaware comments and correcting comments on such media and any citizen matter. Was necessary to ensure the right to do so. In Article 184 (3) of the Constitution, in exercising its original jurisdiction, the right to transparently exercise the authority of national authority was empowered in the present case. The options that were used to achieve this goal only used to be so. The concluding statements of the parties were before the Supreme Court, which could take notice of such material details, which would have a direct impact on the automobile case, determining other legal or factual questions. Or can be left on the forum. By the current parties that influenced the outcome of the Automotive Moto case, were they the ones directly concerned with the independence and integrity of the judiciary? Syed Businessman confirmed in his brief statement that he had met several journalists and shown them the documentary. The evidence of payment to the Chief Justice's son, in lieu of his promises to get the support of the businessman from the Supreme Court during the present case, stands on his written statement, his advice K
