Article 225 and 25 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) of the order, limiting the jurisdiction over the determination of the status of the property, the decision of the High Court in the jurisdiction of the petitioner, whereby the civil review filed by the applicants, was stayed. In view of this time, under section 22 read with section 25 of the Homelessness (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958, a civil suit against the order passed by the Estate Authority for transfer of property was not allowed that the property was a Muslim property. That had been moved into it. The property, therefore, cannot be construed as a vacant property through the Will Deed, and that the High Court should refer the matter to the trial court for the purpose of keeping the evidence so as to determine the status of the property. can go. In view of the applicant's concession and the material available on record. Both the defendants, especially the local commission's report, agreed that the unanimous decision of the High Court should be set aside and to allow both parties to have a hearing. The High Court should be remanded to deal with the jurisdictional review request, and if read with section 25 of section 22. The Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act 1958 was not obstructed by the applicant, the High Court was competent to decide the matter, and the matter would need to be re-sent to a trial court to record additional evidence. And then the case decision on merit was changed to appeal for leave of appeal, the unclean decision of the High Court was set aside and the case was presented to the High Court.