Find a Lawyer

ALLAH WASAYA versus SIKANDAR HAYAT

Article 30 and 200 of the Contempt of the Constitution (XLV of 1860), Section 6 Constitution6 Constitution6 Pakistan, Article ? (la ()) Personal Complaint Magistrate, the jurisdiction was not to record the statement of the effective play by the accused Is going The trial of the crime found in the mischief of Magistrate Section 336 could not proceed, PPC Accreditation Trial Court did not record the complainant statement for the first time, which is a guarantee of irregularity in the proceedings and the High Court Dismissal is not guaranteed. It is rightly stated that in terms of Section 30 of, the CCP can hear all offenses except for those sentenced to death by a magistrate (first class), the Supreme Court intervenes in the High Court's decision. Refused to do

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• PAKISTAN RAILWAYS v. ABDUL FATEH 2012 SCMR 181
• ALLAH DITTA v. State 2012 SCMR 184
• HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION through Project Manager v. SAJID ANWAR 2012 SCMR 186
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources v. DEWAN PETROLEUM (PVT) LTD. Through M.D./Chief Executive 2012 PLD 189
• SAJJAD HUSSAIN v. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, ISLAMABAD 2012 SCMR 195
• Syed MAHBOOB SHAH v. TEHSIL NAZIM, PISHIN 2012 SCMR 196
• ABDUL GHAFOOR v. ABBAS ALI 2012 SCMR 199
• WALI MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE through Prosecutor-General, Balochistan 2012 SCMR 201

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

top advocate from Upper Deval lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes