Find a Lawyer

ALLAH DITTA versus STATE

Wajitkar's testimony on the accusations of Sections 497 and 161 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302/109/34 murder, extraordinary and common-purpose bail, extra-judicial confession, which was recorded sixteen days later. Was involved on the basis of The filing of the FIR evidence against the accused was an extra-judicial admission and the statements of Wajitkar's witnesses had already been finalized at the time of trial and the detention of the accused in the jail was beneficial at this stage. The purpose will not be proven.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• SHAHZAD TANVEER v. State 2012 SCMR 172
• Mst. KULSOOM NAZ v. Dr. ITIFAQ HUSSAIN 2012 SCMR 177
• SHER MUHAMMAD UNAR v. State 2012 PLD 179
• PAKISTAN RAILWAYS v. ABDUL FATEH 2012 SCMR 181
• HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION through Project Manager v. SAJID ANWAR 2012 SCMR 186
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources v. DEWAN PETROLEUM (PVT) LTD. Through M.D./Chief Executive 2012 PLD 189
• ALLAH WASAYA v. SIKANDAR HAYAT 2012 SCMR 193
• SAJJAD HUSSAIN v. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, ISLAMABAD 2012 SCMR 195

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

best advocate from Khewra lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes