Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN RAILWAYS versus ABDUL FATEH

Article 4 Constitution Pakistan, Article 212 (3) Anonymous Complaint Anonymous Complaints Several questioned government employees were dismissed from their jobs and their court appeals were also dismissed on the basis of the order passed by the service tribunal on this basis. Was denied that the inquiry officer had not done so before. Prove a crime against a public servant, there was no reason to ask for four more on the same charge, and on a major anonymous complaint the public servant was punished without giving the investigator the opportunity to testify or a witness, Under which he was not guaranteed. Law-correcting officials failed to bring anything to the notice of the Supreme Court to reject this view, so the service tribunal's Supreme Court refused to interfere with the decision passed by the service tribunal.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF KARACHI v. SAQIB SAMDANI 2012 PLC(CS) 172
• SHAHZAD TANVEER v. State 2012 SCMR 172
• Mst. KULSOOM NAZ v. Dr. ITIFAQ HUSSAIN 2012 SCMR 177
• SHER MUHAMMAD UNAR v. State 2012 PLD 179
• ALLAH DITTA v. State 2012 SCMR 184
• HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION through Project Manager v. SAJID ANWAR 2012 SCMR 186
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources v. DEWAN PETROLEUM (PVT) LTD. Through M.D./Chief Executive 2012 PLD 189
• ALLAH WASAYA v. SIKANDAR HAYAT 2012 SCMR 193

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

property advocate from Mangi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes