Find a Lawyer

SYED MAHBOOB SHAH versus TEHSIL NAZIM, PISHIN

O XXVI, R 9 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Article 42 Declaration of Land Confirmation The issue of the appointment of a commission dispute between the local inspection parties could be resolved by limitation of the plaintiff's property land. Was created Part of a specific Fort No. Local Commission was appointed by the trial court, which submitted its report but was separated because it did not resolve the land boundary dispute. The parties, the Supreme Court, set aside the findings of the three courts below and remanded the case to the trial court for a fresh verdict on all matters after limiting the disputed land and directed the district liaison officer to the survey department. Sharing will limit this land, appeal allowed

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION through Project Manager v. SAJID ANWAR 2012 SCMR 186
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources v. DEWAN PETROLEUM (PVT) LTD. Through M.D./Chief Executive 2012 PLD 189
• ALLAH WASAYA v. SIKANDAR HAYAT 2012 SCMR 193
• SAJJAD HUSSAIN v. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, ISLAMABAD 2012 SCMR 195
• ABDUL GHAFOOR v. ABBAS ALI 2012 SCMR 199
• WALI MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE through Prosecutor-General, Balochistan 2012 SCMR 201
• SANA INDUSTRIES LIMITED v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 2012 SCMR 207
• Ch. MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE v. Mst. FAIZ MAI 2012 PLD 211

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

top civil advocates from Lawrence pur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes