Find a Lawyer

SAJJAD HUSSAIN versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, ISLAMABAD

Appeals before the Service Tribunal Limitation Time 4 Service Tribunal Limited barred the Department from representing the service tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by public servants because it was barred by the same employee filed by the government employee. The Appeal Department was withheld over time, so, even if the Appeal filed before the Service Tribunal was there, over time, it could not receive any relief. The decision passed by the Service Tribunal was reasonable and proceeded with cautious ground. A civil servant was unable to advertise a scope error or legal impairment that led to Intervention may be justified Appeal dismissed

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• ALLAH DITTA v. State 2012 SCMR 184
• HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION through Project Manager v. SAJID ANWAR 2012 SCMR 186
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources v. DEWAN PETROLEUM (PVT) LTD. Through M.D./Chief Executive 2012 PLD 189
• ALLAH WASAYA v. SIKANDAR HAYAT 2012 SCMR 193
• Syed MAHBOOB SHAH v. TEHSIL NAZIM, PISHIN 2012 SCMR 196
• ABDUL GHAFOOR v. ABBAS ALI 2012 SCMR 199
• WALI MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE through Prosecutor-General, Balochistan 2012 SCMR 201
• SANA INDUSTRIES LIMITED v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 2012 SCMR 207

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

pakistani advocates Shahdad Kot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes