Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus MUHAMMAD YOUSAF

The controversy over the former Imperator of Arts 2A & 185 (3) Punjab Pre-Emergency Act (IX of 1991), Section 13 pre-emptive resolution, was that the provisions of the Punjab Pre-Impression Act 1991 were to be considered in accordance with Sharia and There was nothing special in Islamic law to prove the time and place for the performance of Talaat, and that under Article 2A of the Constitution, no provision of law that was in accordance with Islamic law was enforced. Article 2A of the Constitution was not an autonomous act to prove that the location, and the witnesses to whom the summons was submitted, and the aforementioned Article Objectives were set aside. The Constitution was made part of Article 2A of the Constitution. It was the perfect light for guiding the law to regulate its affairs for all the people involved in the legislation and for all the people involved with the rule of the country. ccordingly

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• MUHAMMAD HAFEEZ v. WAPDA 2012 PLC(CS) 902
• Dr. ARSALAN IFTIKHAR v. Malik RIAZ HUSSAIN 2012 PLD 903
• CHIEF EXECUTIVE, MULTAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY (MEPCO), MULTAN v. COLONY TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED 2012 SCMR 906
• CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST SYED YOUSAF RAZA GILLANI, THE PRIME MINISTER OF PAKISTAN 2012 SCMR 909
• DIRECTOR-GENERAL, INTELLIGENCE BUREAU, ISLAMABAD v. MUHAMMAD JAVED 2012 PLC(CS) 913
• MAQBOOL AHMAD v. FAZAL-I-HAQ 2012 SCMR 917
• EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), DISTRICT KHUSHAB AT JAUHARABAD v. IJAZ HUSSAIN 2012 PLC(CS) 917
• BAZ MUHAMMAD KAKAR v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Law and Justice 2012 PLD 923

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

tax advocates from Sialkot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes