Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HAFEEZ versus WAPDA

RR4 (1) (b) and 5 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Service Compulsory Retirement Absence of Fake Medical Certificate Liability by Appellant About His Disease and Service Tribunal Appeal denied by verification of Arriving by a competent authority, and by the Service Tribunal Appellant, in order to intervene in the finding of fact on the question of absent duty, the Service Tribunal was specifically set aside in the memorandum of appeal that he Has presented five medical certificates regarding his illness issued by the Medical Officers of Government. Hospitals and legal counters by medical superintendents, which were never inspected or questioned by the service tribunal, the Supreme Court partially accepted the appeal in respect of the tendering of fake medical certificates And directed the authority to release all liabilities. Of the appellant within the stipulated time

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AUQAF v. DIWAN SHEIKH TAJ-UD-DIN 2012 PLD 897
• SADIA JABBAR v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Revenue Division, Islamabad 2012 PTD 898
• MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. NABI BAKHSH 2012 SCMR 900
• GULZAR HUSSAIN v. DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER 2012 PLC(CS) 901
• Dr. ARSALAN IFTIKHAR v. Malik RIAZ HUSSAIN 2012 PLD 903
• CHIEF EXECUTIVE, MULTAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY (MEPCO), MULTAN v. COLONY TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED 2012 SCMR 906
• CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST SYED YOUSAF RAZA GILLANI, THE PRIME MINISTER OF PAKISTAN 2012 SCMR 909
• MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. MUHAMMAD YOUSAF 2012 SCMR 911

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

top advocates from Takhtbai lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes