ARTICLE 187 Effective investigation authority on the issuance and execution of the alleged business agreement between the defendant (businessman) and the applicant (the son serving the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court) in an attempt to influence the judicial process. Professional relationship between the General Attorney Following the directions of the Supreme Court on the inquiry of the General and the Respondents through the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) formed by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) and the Chairman, NAB's Attorney General. The NAB is writing a letter to the authorities. Applicant of the case alleges that the contents of the letter above show that the Attorney General has exercised unlawful and unnecessary influence on NAB, and that he acted in a deliberate manner and defendant's Had influenced the NAB in favor. Or the professional relationship with the respondents is not entrusted with any responsibility in the present case to the Attorney General if it discloses to the Supreme Court that the Supreme Court had directed that the State's professional affiliation with the Respondent. The machinery should be brought into motion. the Inquiry into the present matter, but the contents of his letter to the Chairman NAB make it clear that the Attorney General is better off moving the machinery of the State and has taken his stand and used the words in his own words. Did. In the letter that should have been used by the Independent Investigator, Word Expected To, the letter revealed to the Attorney General that the Chairman, NAB, had an impact on the performance of his duties which was required by law to perform them. Must give
