BAZ MUHAMMAD KAKAR versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE
Offerings, Sections 2 (a), 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12 and 13 Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act (XXXV of 1973), Sections 9 (1) (e) and 13 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 5 and 184 (3) bar constituency and lawfully applying constitutional application under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution, filed by applicants under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution, including the Pakistan Bar Council and Provincial Bar Councils. Constitutional Petitions The Attorney General (on behalf of the federal government), in the constitutional position of the Supreme Court Act, 2012, claimed that the Council of Pakistan and the Council of Pakistan were required to file petitions on behalf of the Bar Councils and to validate any law. To infectious challenge the council did not work and character. Under the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act, 1973, the federation and the provinces had legal status as the highest bodies representing the legal community, respectively, indicating the active interest of the bar councils in the present petition. d The vitality and rule of law in society and Article 5 of the Constitution provides that obedience to the Constitution and the law is an unforgettable responsibility of every citizen. The said Article imposed upon all persons the task of upholding the Constitution. Therefore, as a matter of law, like all other natural persons, legal entities were obliged to observe that the constitution was enacted and enforced, and the withdrawal of the Attorney General had no meaning and accordingly. The same was allowed for rejected constitutional requests.
