The successor to the Section 2 annual precedent, the legal heir of the owner of the 1948 Limited, the privilege of division of the property, after the death of the owner of the suit property in 1937, had three persons - his two sons and a widow equal heir. The same happened under the customs and customs of the Bodla families at that time, the widow was not the sole owner of the 1/3 share so she inherited it, from her deceased husband, after the widow's death on 5 3 1962. , Litigation between legal heirs began as the dispute between the parties between the deceased property owner and the widow's legal heirs was whether the widow's legal inheritance was solely from her owner (s). / The third share is entitled because the limited owner is the exclusive legal heir or such property will be returned. And devise all the legal heirs of the last male owner (s), thereby reducing the widow's 1 / 3rd estate to her own privileges to the extent that her widow was rejected by the Supreme Court. In keeping with the decisions and orders of the High Court made, the Chief Settlement Commissioner was required to determine the matter according to the law that the last men on the dates related to the elimination of the limited interests of the female allies. Owner is entitled to inherit. Appeal dismissed on the provisions of the Muslim Personal Law (Sharia) Application Act, 1962
