CHIEF EXECUTIVE, MULTAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY (MEPCO), MULTAN versus COLONY TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED
Section 19 Electricity Act (IX of 1910), Section 26A Dispute over Power Compensation Review The formation of a committee to resolve such disputes After the Supreme Court has constituted the committee, the Chairman Water and Power Development for this decision. Was sent to the authority (WAPDA). Of the three independent engineers against whom a review request was filed and the Supreme Court directed that another person, instead of Chairman Wapda, be appointed as a member of the committee, to decide the dispute. ? With the argument that the committee's decision was not unanimous and Chairman Wapda was requested to intervene and pass some decisive order, it faced hesitation and indifference. The committee ruled that the committee made a finding against the Supreme Court against them. Coalition observed that its order had been complied with in relation to the proceedings of the committee and no contempt was committed. , And the Applicant Electric Company may take advantage of the matter before the Majlis Forum, which was given after a finding of the Committee's results. The Committee, the Supreme Court, would not comment on it, as the court could not sit on the said decision as the Court of Appeal could not determine any remedy in the present case as the court where no reference. Didn't occupy the land. Need to exercise your advisory jurisdiction to advise the electric company or to determine the future path of the matter, in contempt of court dismissed
