RAJA MUHAMMAD SHARIF KHAN versus CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Section 41 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), sections 42 and 44, on the basis of the occupied possession, the claim of ownership of vacant land was dismissed by the High Court on the ground that it had Relief claims are urban in nature. And on the religions filed by the High Court by the Civil Court, the Declaration and Permanent Order on the basis of adverse possession was to be passed on the matter, and the Civil Court had passed the previous order in favor of the Appellant. In the presence of a civil court order, the equity entity of the equity property was without jurisdiction and legal authority; in the present case, the jurisdiction of the civil court was terminated in connection with all matters that were attempted to be indirectly protected. The Civil Court, despite being the ultimate jurisdictional court, may pass any decision or decision on the party's civil rights. The jurisdiction was clearly and implicitly banned. And yet he has passed judgment or decree, at the same time, in the eyes of the law can be considered an impure. And whenever pressure came, it could have been avoided that ill-gotten gains could not be protected under the jurisdiction of the writ.
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2012
