RAJA MUHAMMAD PERVAIZ KHAN versus AJ&K GOVERNMENT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, AJ&K GOVERNMENT MUZAFFARABAD
Sections 7, 18B and 25 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), section 42 land allotment 1 kanal, cancellation of 17 marla land, allotment of land for religious purposes, filed by the name of Thakur Dwara. Was. Of the land mentioned by the non-Muslim, 12 Marla was in the possession of the appellants, and the remaining piece of land was allotted to a bank. Filed a petition before. The Seed's application was dismissed on the basis of the Evacuee Property Act, 1957, that could not be assigned to the Aukeland Cooperative Bank. The allotment of land to Aukei Property Cooperative Bank Custodian, after the approval of the government, was transferred to the property. And the bank, through a sale agreement, which was largely appellants on one hand, claimed that Thakur Dwara, a land allotted for religious purposes, could not be allotted to anyone and that the bank The allotment in favor was illegal. On the other hand, they claimed to have allotted the land as local mismanagement, which was a clear contradiction by them. Appellants failed to prove that they had suffered from an act of divisive immunity. Or the government had nothing. The record writing petition to support the appeal claims can be entertained only at the request of the bereaved.
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2012
