The constitution of Sections 13 and 8 was delayed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner (Stability), delaying the Commissioner's Maintenance Scope in approving the holdings before the Article 199 Constitutional Petitions Board of Revenue. The final order was passed. The proceedings under the West Pakistan Consolidation of Holdings Ordinance 1960 could either be amended or amended or amended before the Board of Revenue by the Commissioner and the Board of Revenue, or the Commissioner was under the Additional Commissioner (Stability) under the circumstances. In the present case, the respondents' ownership and ownership of the premises was confined and in the review of the Board Revenue, which was not opened, after the land granted to the applicants by the Consolidation Officer Order in connection with the amendment of stability. Was. For any concession, Joint / M Ishratka was divided and the Vandas were prepared by the Conduct Officer as the parties were bound by their agreement under the agreement between the parties and could not withdraw with the consent of the parties. They recorded their signature / thumb impression. The petition filed by the petitioners for review of the facts and review of the petition was dismissed on the finding of facts, no wrongdoing was indicated by the petitioners in the offending order, the High Court has only jurisdiction in the lower forum or One cannot consider the question of being illegal. Wrong, illegal or irregularities were found in the missing orders. The constitutional petition was rejected in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
