Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 337 F (IV) and 34 attempted to commit a felony for an Amjad, guaranteeing any person with bail, and granting further investigation. Was reported to have suffered a minor injury. The complainant's leg, which was an unimportant part of the body and his sentence was less than 10 years where the sentence provided was less than 10 years, the alleged offense would not fall under the prohibition clause of section 497 (I). ? The CCP suspect did not repeat the shootings, the challan of the case was already presented by the investigating agency to the statements of the trial court complainant and an eyewitness, it was also recorded that the accused was referred to the police. There was no need for more. Further investigations would not serve any purpose, sending the accused behind bars, in which case the case against the accused was not outrageous, but rather a matter of minor injury to the non-critical part of the complainant's body. Influenced by the verdict, the Shariah court under which the accused was granted bail was in line with the rules governing the issue of bail; the Supreme Court did not require any interference; Will not interfere with the discretion provided, unless otherwise disclosed. Crooked, wavy or against the law
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2012
