Section 497 (2) of the Contempt of the Constitution (XLV of 1860), Section 324/337/34 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Article 42 The attempt to compel the Ummah, which resulted in the Shaja, joint intentions. The appellant respondent / defendant, who was named in the FIR against the grant of bail, was declared a single pistol shot which struck the appellant / complainant on his right leg, The non-essential part was that the shooting charge against the accomplices was not found to be valid, the medical report revealed that the injury was an unseen Jifa Hashima, whose death was not a life sentence or a transport sentence, but Thus the injury was sentenced to five years in prison, in the circumstances, do not come under Section 497 prohibited clause, the RP did not guarantee deep appreciation of the evidence on the stage of the guarantee. And the only bird's eye is that if the court did not violate the principles laid down in granting bail, then its cancellation was not appropriate when the bail was granted, for its cancellation, strong and non-binding. Must be modest. Foundations / Reasons In the present case, it was not yet decided whether the accused's case had come under the jurisdiction of Section 324, PPC, which was to be decided by the trial court at the trial, Which had not yet begun. The inquiry into this matter was already complete and the respondent / accused did not need further investigation. At such a stage the cancellation of bail will not serve any useful purpose, in any order passed by the Shariah court. No illegal or irregularities were found, vacancies for the accused to grant bail
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2012
