The application filed by the defendants for the division of the applicable jurisdiction for section 11 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), the principle of the Declaration of Race 42, was accepted and the distribution to the Financial Commissioner The order had reached the deadline. Finally, the writ petition was dismissed by the High Court and the lower courts came to the conclusion that in the presence of the decision of the Revenue Authorities in respect of the same land between the parties, the case attracted the principle of the judiciary. had gone. And the petition filed by the plaintiff was influenced by the principle of race judasta. Counsel for the plaintiff argued that if it had been decided earlier by a tribunal or tax authorities, it would not apply to the principles of the justice judiciary. This principle of the race judiciary was applicable only if the matter was ultimately decided by a civil court in a previous case, the dispute was canceled, the principle of the race judiciary was also proceeded in addition to civil suit. Was fully implemented, such as action before the Revenue Authorities. The division proceedings, initiated by the accused, were finalized by the Revenue Assistant Court of the Financial Commissioner. And then in the writ petition of the same land between the same party, which was the subject of exemption in the present suit, under the circumstances, the principle of race Judeta fell, and the court below rejected and upheld it. Was. On this basis the High Court
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2012
