SIRAJ DIN versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY MUZAFFARABAD
Failure to produce the required party to the writ petition in the Sections 42 and 44 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OI, R 1 Retention of the Writ Petition, which the High Court challenged in the order passed by the Member Board of Revenue, He applied. Setting aside the order, but the Board of Revenue was not set up as a party to the appellant, at the stage of granting leave before the Supreme Court, the petition moved to present the Board of Revenue as a party. , If any order of an application is denied, the writ petition was challenged by the authority. And this option was not created as a party, the writ petition was not competent and was liable to be rejected. The last order which was challenged was the writ petition passed by the Board of Revenue and the Board. The writ petition was not prepared as a party. , Was responsible for dismissing a writ petition that was not properly formed
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2012
