Section 514 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 364, 324 and 337/34 of kidnapping or abduction for murder, attempted murder, which resulted in the bail of the accused in the confinement of the Shuja and the common intention bond. Was accepted. 3,00,000 and the defendant, who was the real brother of the accused, was granted bail, it was alleged that he did not appear in court, he was declared absconding and absconding with the law and bail was granted on bail. At the request of, he was postponed to trial. A poor man is unable to pay the full amount of bail, he has been entitled to the lesser amount of bail amounting to Rs. 300,000 to Rs. 75,000. No real reason was given for the reduction in the amount of bail, the two courts below observed that the accused usually escapes after being released on bail. And the courts, acting against the bailouts, will forfeit the entire amount of the bail, because when the trend is discouraged, the court does not guarantee bail in the case of confiscation and confiscation of money due to poverty. ? As a guarantee, it can be assumed that the bail was attached to his brother and that he was facilitated in the trial court's order, as well as the Shariah court, which was recorded in an arbitrary manner and without any offense. Committed a crime of nature. The following two courts also did not take into account the conduct and guarantees of the accused, while the apex court, while recording the order of reducing the amount of bonds of the two lower courts,
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2012
