Section 13 students were required to prove the performance of the pre-emptor, such as Tal, for example, in a case of possession by prejudice, discrimination and prejudice, in the present case, in the present case, definitively. The place where the witnesses were sitting as well as the witnesses when the inquiry was performed was not taken out by the pre-emptor's witnesses according to the prejudices in the rock which was fatal to the plaintiff's evidence case. Was not mentioned. Variations will be irrelevant and cannot be read even when the party cannot be allowed to add evidence beyond its own pleadings when proof of a particular plea was not presented then it is not allowed to be presented during the evidence. Could have been given. The informant, who was fatal to his case, was obliged to write a notice about him that he wrote a note about it and that there were major contradictions. The record in connection with the preparation of the original notice and the copying thereof was in the record and the appellate court could not find any justification for dismissing the case, even in the slightest contradiction in the pre-discrimination case. Failure to prove that for the best of the evidence as evidence, the performance of the petitioner was withheld on the affidavit and the order passed by the appellate court was set aside and the trial court reinstated. A review of what was happening was accepted
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
