Section 498 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 489F Conduct before the Arrest of Illegal Check Devices (XXVI of 1881), Section 84: Delay in the presentation of a negotiated instrument grant check The inquiry was issued for payment on 2 2011 and 11 2013 issued on 25, 2013, when it was bounced due to insufficient funds. It was submitted by the accused that the FIR was illegal. Was registered which was a negotiating device that was presented to the bank after an interval of approximately 30 months under section 84 of the Conversation Tool Act, 1881, To be presented for payment within a reasonable time of its issue, the dishonest intention of issuing a check to attract the offense under Section 489F, PPC, was illegal, which was still pending after the evidence. No date, time or place of alleged payment of Rs 8 lakh by the complainant to be set up was filed in the FIR. The complainant has filed a complaint against the accused on the charge of recovering the disputed amount of the file. Had, therefore, no recovery pending against the accused under section 4899F, not in the prohibited clause of PPC Section 7 497 Fact is, the PC is not under suspicion of corruption against the accused. The purpose of pre-arrest bail was to protect innocent people from dishonesty, harassment and detention on the basis of false pretenses, in which case bail was allowed in advance.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
