Sections 2, 2, & Q and the actions taken by several persons in the offer of a joint intention, 999, if the result of the act was committed and where no clear provision was made for its punishment. The benefit of the doubt was the dishonesty correction effect medical evidence Scope FIR was filed 2 hours and 40 minutes delay, although the police station was 5 km away from the scene of the incident 16 hours in the post-mortem examination. Unexpected delay in showing that the FIR was not mentioned on time, the debate recorded its supplemental statement in which it (shooting the victim). By changing, the accused had taken three different motions to falsely implicate the accused on three different occasions. It was sufficient to refute his evidence and to ultimately determine that he was not present at the crime scene at the relevant time, nor had he witnessed any witnesses who, according to the testimony, Made dishonest reforms to expose the testimony of, his credibility was lost Medical evidence, the account could not support the account. The accused should be held responsible for the murder of the victim, while acquitting the accomplices on the basis of similar evidence, especially when the accomplices were assigned to carry firearm wounds on key sections of the convict. The testimony of the witnesses did not appeal to the prudent mind that it was unlikely that speaking out loud in the open space could lead to the murder plot. Medical evidence will only be used to confirm molecular evidence related to the location of the injury, the location of the incident and the weapon of the crime, etc. But the medi
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
