In Articles 2 (2 (b) and Q 34 of the trial), the definition of common-purpose evidence was lodged with the FIR, which was delayed by approximately 16 hours on the statement of the deceased's real brother, who was not an eyewitness to the incident. There were serious doubts about the truth of the prosecution's story, post-mortem inspections on the deceased's body were conducted with a delay of approximately 36 to 36 hours, with no comprehensible explanation available because of the said delay. Serious suspicion about the truth of the case. The prosecution witnesses were not residents of the alleged location, but they were residents of another location. About 9,593 kilometers away from the location of the convoy, statements of both prosecution witnesses were contradictory, which were not acceptable statements - the credibility of a witness was recorded with a delay of 24 hours, if his state Under the section 161, the CCP was presented with no plausible explanation, the sequence of events described in their statements was highly unlikely to be witnessed, Claimed to be present on the occasion of the crime, were not present and their evidence was not a motive of conviction; No 30 bore pistol was recovered, was not recovered, and was unnecessary in this case if the crime was not vacated and the report by the Franz Science Laboratory Prosecution failed to bring the crime home. The trial court, and the trial court, found the accused guilty in no way justified, while the unreliable, unverified testimony presented by the interested witnesses
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
