SONERI BANK LTD. versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY OF LAW
Section 165, Explanation and Amendment to the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 73 (2) (a) (G) and 199 Constitutional Appeal, the wires taken by the applicants were that section 165 and section in the Income Tax Ordinance. Explanation should be inserted at 165A. 2001, the granting of the Constitution's justification for section 165 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 by the mini-bill was related to the government's submission of various statements by the person collecting or deducting the tax and the information about these persons in the statements. There were people with whom they knew about it. The amount and the information collected, including tax deductions or deposits, are used by the tax authorities in the Income Tax and other tax rules. Similarly, tax authorities can confirm whether the withholding agent is. ? The Income Tax Ordinance properly withheld taxes as per the rates listed in 2001 and thereby deposited the tax collected in the state treasury. In the prescribed period, such information was used to monitor the withholding agents and thus the collection of taxes was regulated by such procedures and the information could be used to see if. The persons to whom payment has been made, whether their receipts and income have been properly declared. The Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, came under the provisions of the wording of the Enforcement Act, or regulating any tax as used in Article 73 (2) (a) of the Constitution, the clarification of the question was no substantive provision, And could not. Do not include anything in the current section and explain, facilitate and assist in interpreting this section
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
