MUHAMMAD YOUNUS versus TRANSPORT OFFICER, CENTRAL TRANSPORT POOL/AUTHORITY, CENTRAL TRANSPORT POOL, MUZAFFARABAD
Section 3 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), a service-dismissed service tribunal from Service 47, filed an appeal to the service-removed service tribunal, which sought to restore employment from employment to service. Later he was restored from his job. The date of the removal, but between termination and reinstatement was considered a leave without pay, the employee partially challenged the decision before the Supreme Court that he would be treated for absentee leave until his removal. As a therapeutic, setting aside the search and removal of services to the extent of recovery by the leave service tribunal without pay, which was on record, did not demand any intervention by the Supreme Court and Search for a service tribunal was maintained to treat these alleged absence periods. The date of removal without leave without pay was not in accordance with the principles of Law W. The order passed by the epilepsy department was illegal. And as a result, the employee was reinstated, the employee was granted all kinds of acceptance of the job appeal, the service tribunal's decision was amended. And this Court held that during the period between the removal and rehabilitation of the employees, the law is entitled to all expenditure according to the law. The period of alleged absence will be considered as exemption.
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2012
