R43 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Sections 42 and 44 of the Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), O XLVII, R1 Review Request for review on the qualification procedure were excluded on this basis. It was filed without it that the submission of a court lawyer's certificate, which was required under the provisions of R43 for the 1984 AHRC Code of Conduct, would present the basis on which a review was sought. Was made, clearly and clearly, with a certificate signed by the Advocate in the form prescribed under Rule 43 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir High Court, 1984. With a certificate along with them, under R 43 it was stated that no such application would be entertained by the court. The said certificate was required to be filed by the Advocate as well as the revision request if it was stated that the certificate was not accompanied by the petition for review, the court will not entertain the request. In the present case the position varies. This was because the court not only entertained the petition, but the process was also issued. In pursuance of this process, the other party entered into its presence and contested the request for review, and after hearing the two sides, a null decision was made when an application for review without the necessary certificate was entertained. , It would be deemed that the requirement was removed by the court under R43, in the circumstances, after entertaining the review request, it was not justified to exclude it on the basis that it was not authorized. Consider the application when filing a court
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2012
