Sections 3 and 7 of the Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Sections 22A and 22B of the Qazf Appellant filed a complaint against the defendant under the Criminal Code 7 (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, which was dismissed by the respondent. Was done. Sections 22A, and 22B, CCPC, alleging that the appellant had committed adultery with others, was found wrong by the local police during the investigation and the appellant. The request was dismissed when the feeling of grief was gone. 21 months after withdrawing the petition filed under Sections 22A, and 22B, under section 7 of the Qazif (Enforcement of Limit) Ordinance, 1979, the PC stated that the unlawful delay was caused by the appellant's trial court. There was an error in finding this requirement. In the absence of the completion of clause 3 of the Qazf (Enforcement Border) Ordinance, 1979, the complainant was dismissed and neither had any statement been made to C, although the police found him to be a liar, The court did not find the respondent positive about lying, the respondent did not make a statement under section 161, according to the CRPC, the appellant had intercourse with her. There are numerous disputes between the parties, the trial court's improperly ordered verdict, neither misleading, disobedient, and serious, demanded intervention by the Federal Shariah Court, appeals were dismissed, in the circumstances.
