In sections 302 (b) and 392, on the morning of the trial, the testimony of the robbery evidence stated that all three witnesses faced a lengthy investigation, but the facts of their evidence could not be ascertained. There was no element that further investigation officer in the ocular account did not take the post-mortem examination. The case, but it was admitted that the incident occurred and the accused was arrested on the spot with a pistol. The accused has neither denied the incident nor advised the witnesses that legal action in this regard. Failure to send Joey to the forensic science laboratory to match the recovered pistol, though irregular, was not the nature of the CH that could damage the entire prosecution case, although no direct evidence was available in this case. So that the accused was killed by the fire, but his arrest, his and two live cartridges with a pistol. By arguing with Lee's recovery, it has been fully proven that the incident was alleged by the prosecutor as he has been alleged to have been able to present any material or evidence to link himself to the crime. The prosecution had, without any doubt, completely proved its case against the accused. On the basis of the medical evidence of the ocular account, recoveries and the charges, the circumstances were rightly punished.
