PROFESSOR KAZIM HUSSAIN versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LAW, JUSTICE AND PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS, ISLAMA
Article 203 D Office Memorandum No. R2 (3) / 03 dated 31 7 2004, Ministry of Housing and Works, F5 (17) / Yards Amp (i) / 73, Dated 20 11 1974 and F2 (1) R5 / 91, dated 25 8 1991, the House of Representatives of the Finance Ministry for Islam House Rent Allowance for husband and wife was a civil servant, and his complaint was that when both husband and wife were public servants, they both moved to the house. Houses were rented. And not only was marriage unacceptable with either of the two, nor was it a crime, and for that reason, a civil servant should not be punished or deprived of his house after marriage, even though both spouses. Conveyance allowances are entitled to rent even if they were operating at the same station and in one place, and the same logic was applied to the rent of the office to the extent of the office memorandum / rule that a spouse from a home rent allowance. A civil servant and one of whom was allotted government housing was also deprived of house rent. In accordance with Article 203D (3) of the Constitution, the Federal Shariah Court directed, to the respective independent institutions and institutions, including the Federal Government, as well as the provincial governments and universities of Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. / Take necessary steps to amend the rules so that the integration of Islam can be made and a petition is allowed under it.
