Section 417 (2A) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 395 and 411 of the Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 10 (4) of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), Section 5 and 6 Duty, fraudulently receiving stolen property, Adultery Bill Jabbar appealed to the businessman against criminal judgment in two cases, one under the common law, one under the adult, and less under the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000. In the present case of the two children, the two accused, who were both accused, were adults, despite the separate trial by the trial court, the trial court conducted separate cases in both the cases. Not cleared through stabilization / sole judgment, the case was tried separately. Accuracy When the younger children and adult accused were charged separately, and their cases were kept separate, the verdict in both cases should also have been filed separately. Otherwise, making separate allegations, and holding separate trials, would have been meaningless a trial court by recording a stable verdict, the whole exercise was invalidated because the recording of a separate verdict of an invalid accused (1). There was no technical error in writing the CCP Separate Decision, the Judicial Justice System Ordinance, 2000 and Section 367, but in fact there was a fundamental flaw in the proceedings that the court had to make a final decision by working with intelligence. The decision should be made and after the facts are cited. , Writing a separate decision on the circumstances and evidence records, nor Section 37, can be considered merely a remedy for irregularities under the CRPC, nor can the parties
