In the Section 6 Protection of Women (Criminal Laws Amendment) Act (VI, 2006), Qazf, who accused the suspects of taking advantage of doubts about scope-guiding principles under Islamic jurisprudence, alleged that he had made the Exodus. And applied for a DNA test. On complying with the complainant applicants, the deceased stated that he was the victim's son who was transferred by a special Judicial Magistrate complainant applicants to a private complaint which was dismissed by the trial court whose request for the accused respondents. And DNA was transmitted for testing. The Special Judicial Magistrate was acquitted on the charge of prosecution and never challenged nor pursued by the Respondent, nor the proceedings under Section 202, CRPC. No order was issued in this regard nor did the accused respondents make any statement in support of the said request. Initial times by the accused respondents, none of the accused respondents appeared at the hearing, no supporting statement was available on record to confirm the contents of the petition filed by the accused respondents, only complaint The solitary statement of the applicant was in the record but there was a citizen present on the matter between the parties and the question as to whether the request was actually transmitted by the accused respondents was still reduced to suspected mystery. The respondents did not present any evidence in support of the charge of adultery at any stage Nor did they also hold the record their statements
