ABDUL MAJID KHAN versus SPEAKER AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, MUZAFFARABAD
Sections 18, 25 (1) (a), (4) and 44 of the Legislative Assembly of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, R 29 (1) (2) in the written petition resolution of the vote of no confidence against the Prime Minister. Presented in the Assembly. The letter of the Speaker Assembly wrote to the Chief Election Commissioner for initiating proceedings under section 25 (1) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act of 1974, whose seats were vacated after the resignation was approved. Went on, denying the applicants a letter published in the newspapers, alleging that the members of the self-assembly called for the cancellation of a letter from the speaker of the assembly when they were asked to finalize the vote of no-confidence vote. It is directed to convene an assembly meeting. Was the speaker's letter disclosed to any person through whom this record was disclosed that after the speaker resigned, the office bearers disclosed signatures on the same date from the assembly record and It cannot be assumed that he resigned only one day after filing such a resolution against the Prime Minister, thus, the Speaker was obliged to personally inquire about his resignations, not the Speaker's role. ? Like any postman, but rather informed of such resignations, the House was obliged to inquire into the position of the House to ascertain the true and voluntary nature of its position, and the Commissioner Speaker to make it known. The applicant was obliged to grant the right to a hearing before sending the matter. His legal and constitutional role was presented in a fair, transparent and equitable manner
