Find a Lawyer

SARDAR WAHEED HUSSAIN KHAN versus DIRECTOR GENERAL SEERA AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Sections 44 and 15 Written Request Equal Affidavit before the Law Construction Work Price Adjustment The applicants / contractors were refused payment of the price adjustment by the department Other conditional payments were paid to other contractors. Was denied, writing request was affirmed with affidavit but respondents were required to pay. Neither was presented nor any written statement was filed or affidavit was affirmed. Counter Affidavit can only be denied by right p Registration Authority has accepted and been ordered to pay all the bills. According to the price adjustment formula

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2013

• State v. DILDAR HUSSAIN 2013 PCrLJ 1552
• Mst. NAZIA AZIZ v. MUHAMMAD ILLYAS 2013 MLD 1627
• TANVIR AHMED CHOUDHARY v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2013 CLC 1634
• MUHAMMAD ALAM v. HAQ NAWAZ KHAN 2013 CLC 1752
• WAPDA through Chief Engineer, Raising Project Mangla Dam v. TAJ BEGUM 2013 CLC 1827
• ABDUL MAJID KHAN v. SPEAKER AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, MUZAFFARABAD 2013 CLC 1908
• MUHAMMAD AZIZ KHAN v. CUSTODIAN EVACUEE PROPERTY, AZAD GOVERNMENT, MUZAFFARABAD 2013 MLD 1922
• Malik MUDASAR v. The STATE through Advocate-General Azad Jammu and Kashmir 2013 YLR 2271

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2013 →

family advocate from Kalar Syedian lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes