Find a Lawyer

MAQBOOL HUSSAIN versus ABDUL JABBAR

O XVII, R 3 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), the trial plaintiff was ordered not to present a list of witnesses who gave the trial court more than eighteen opportunities to dismiss the evidence He failed to present evidence under the orders of a court-approved bid, after the negligence against the plaintiff, he was not entitled to any further relief. In view of all these legal provisions, it was decided that the appeal of the High Court's interference bail was dismissed.

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2013

• WAPDA through Chief Engineer, Raising Project Mangla Dam v. TAJ BEGUM 2013 CLC 1827
• ABDUL MAJID KHAN v. SPEAKER AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, MUZAFFARABAD 2013 CLC 1908
• MUHAMMAD AZIZ KHAN v. CUSTODIAN EVACUEE PROPERTY, AZAD GOVERNMENT, MUZAFFARABAD 2013 MLD 1922
• Malik MUDASAR v. The STATE through Advocate-General Azad Jammu and Kashmir 2013 YLR 2271
• SHAHID AZIZ v. CUSTODIAN EVACUEE PROPERTY AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2013 YLR 2570
• MAHFOOZ KHAN v. S.S.P., KOTLI 2013 YLR 2636
• ABDUL JABBAR v. KHADAM HUSSAIN 2013 YLR 2786
• MUHAMMAD KHURSHEED v. BAROO 2013 PLD 1

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2013 →

us immigration advocates from Kot Ghulam Mohd lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes