Find a Lawyer

TANVIR AHMED CHOUDHARY versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Section 19 and 30 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), section 44 (2) writ petition denying the authority to issue license to applicants for setting up and operating an FM-107 radio channel in Mirpur The High Court shall abolish the jurisdiction of the petitioner, thus, the writ petition was affected by section 44 (2) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act 1974.

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2013

• BABAR JAMIL v. CONSERVATOR FOREST, MUZAFFARABAD CIRCLE 2013 PLC(CS) 1482
• ARSHAD MEHMOOD v. BARKAT ALI 2013 PCrLJ 1530
• State v. DILDAR HUSSAIN 2013 PCrLJ 1552
• Mst. NAZIA AZIZ v. MUHAMMAD ILLYAS 2013 MLD 1627
• MUHAMMAD ALAM v. HAQ NAWAZ KHAN 2013 CLC 1752
• Sardar WAHEED HUSSAIN KHAN v. DIRECTOR GENERAL SEERA AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2013 MLD 1759
• WAPDA through Chief Engineer, Raising Project Mangla Dam v. TAJ BEGUM 2013 CLC 1827
• ABDUL MAJID KHAN v. SPEAKER AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, MUZAFFARABAD 2013 CLC 1908

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2013 →

divorce advocates from Narang Mandi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes