Find a Lawyer

SHAHID AZIZ versus CUSTODIAN EVACUEE PROPERTY AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Section 18A Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974) Section 44 Writ Petition for Allotment of Land by Special Tribunal for Detection of Property by the Tribunal It was found that the allotment of property in the dispute Was done in favor of Custodian had dismissed the applicant's request for the cancellation of the allotment, which was discovered by Custodian as a special jurisdiction tribunal, which recorded the facts, which were generally Sucrosynct and in this case a non There were no circumstances involved, the High Court could not have joined the writ jurisdiction. Facts filed such as fraudulent petition and fraud commission are dismissed

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2013

• ABDUL MAJID KHAN v. SPEAKER AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, MUZAFFARABAD 2013 CLC 1908
• MUHAMMAD AZIZ KHAN v. CUSTODIAN EVACUEE PROPERTY, AZAD GOVERNMENT, MUZAFFARABAD 2013 MLD 1922
• Malik MUDASAR v. The STATE through Advocate-General Azad Jammu and Kashmir 2013 YLR 2271
• MAQBOOL HUSSAIN v. ABDUL JABBAR 2013 YLR 2524
• MAHFOOZ KHAN v. S.S.P., KOTLI 2013 YLR 2636
• ABDUL JABBAR v. KHADAM HUSSAIN 2013 YLR 2786
• MUHAMMAD KHURSHEED v. BAROO 2013 PLD 1
• IMTIAZ ALI v. Raja LIAQAT ALI KHAN 2013 PLD 6

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2013 →

jobs for fresh advocates from Kashmir lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes