MST. MIRRAT MANZOOR BAJWA versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, ISLAMABAD
Section 5 Schedule and Section 17 Dowry and Bridal Gifts (Prohibition) Act (XLIII of 1976), Section 2 (b) and 10 Dowry and Bridal Gifts (Prohibition) Rules, 1976, R4 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional petition Dowry lawsuit for retrieval Articles Thumb Applicable List of dowry articles submitted in evidence in support of both parties' own claims, this list submitted by the family court-appointed Appellate Court. The court has approved, on the request of the wife, that the rule of thumb applies. Proceedings before the Family Court, nor the provisions of law testimony, 1984 1984 1984 or its principles, were, therefore, credible in connection with the purchase of the articles of dowry prepared by Valdetti's wife in her statement. What was such a list. He was not ready at the time of his marriage, while his father was otherwise dismissed, otherwise the rule of thumb does not preclude a party from establishing his claim; on the basis of such rule, the party refuses to take responsibility. Without proof, the claim of the opposite party will not be pressed on the shoulders which is in the form of Form D1 in accordance with R4 (1) of the Dowry and Bridal Gifts (Prohibition) Rules 1976, prepared by the wife. Was not prepared, so it was in the context of the rule of thumb that the purchase of domestic articles would not be considered in support of his claim, would not qualify, and the purchase of the articles mentioned by the wife's parents. The need for proof of this will be given to him before or after. The High Court rejected the constitutional application in the circumstances. r \ n
