MAJOR (RETD.) AHMAD NADEEM SADAL versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Sections 6, 28, 29, 30 and 31 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Chairman, Pakistan Cricket Board (Board Board), Appointment of Legal Status for Chairman, Pakistan Cricket Board Scope Part IV Part 28 of the Constitution of Pakistan Cricket Board , 29, 30 and 31 were added with the purpose that the desired Chairman Pakistan Cricket Board be allowed to retain his position. Surprisingly as the Chairman of Article 28 of the Constitution of the Pakistan Cricket Board The recommended qualification for the position was experience only. The administration or the administration and it was absolutely silent about the experience of cricket, understanding the information about the game of cricket and the Code of Conduct of the International Cricket Council, the constitution of the nomination committee was against the spirit of holding elections according to democratic values, Part IV of the Constitution of Pakistan. The Cricket Board was a fraudulent and dubious tool for engineer appointment and the specific chairman of the board was the specific mentor for him. Was not based on administrative qualities and managerial abilities, but apparently because he was president. A public sector bank, a status banker and the personal appointment of individuals in connection with the affairs was completely fraudulent because of the re-appointment of the desired chairman, as there was no election according to the spirit of the democratic process. It was like that. Part IV of Sections 28, 29, 30 and 31 of the Constitution of Pakistan Cricket Board was declared to be illegal, undemocratic, democratic values as well as democratic values, violation of the rights of persons to be elected. ?
