MUMTAZ AHMED SIDDIQUI versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, (WEST) ISLAMABAD
Article 3, 7 and 8 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional petition In question, the original owner of the shop who gave the same rent to the tenant, after the deceased, the deceased's legal heir appointed his special counsel against the tenant. Filing a dismissal request, which was eventually granted by the special counsel allowed to be executed, the tenant granted the special counsel his possession, but the same day the tenant filed a special lawyer complaint against the special counsel. Kurds, according to which the illegal settlement was dismissed because it has been observed that no crime has been proved. Evidence proceeding with the trial, the complainant may demand from the Executive Court to remedy the occupation of the shop, the order of Sade was challenged in the constitutional petition if any person was unlawfully deposed. If so, it was entitled to it under the Unlawful Dispossession Act, 2005 without prejudice, to comply with the provisions of the said Act. O Such other remedies, which may be available to him simultaneously under other laws, are filed with the FI. Was not obligated to receive any treatment under the RK Lodging, Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005, and to rule out double risk. Will attract, it is said, because it is attracting accused the ruling. The trial was tried by a competent court. And there was a verdict or sentence or order of acquittal, in the present case, after the execution of the possession warrant there was a special charge of settlement; in the presence of serious allegations, there is no rationale for deciding the complaint in the court below. Was. Complainant's own case
