The former suit was ordered against the defendants in the suit suit for the specific performance of the O-6, R-6 and Section 96 agreements during the current appeal proceedings, whether it was, on the basis of the mere and only allegations. Despite the other legal aspects of the case. The plates and narratives in the written statements were valid in accordance with the decree approving O XII, R 6, CPC (Defendant's decision on admission) (Accreditation by the defendants O XII, Roll 6, CPC) The petition was not submitted under the auspices and the case was settled by partial evidence recording and partial evidence. Then the previous order was passed which allowed the application for order or decision on the basis of admissibility of the facts. Failed to deliver or found it appropriate and appropriate - such claim cannot be allowed to claim order or decision on such dispute later. The admission decision was limited to the proceedings of a direct trial, and that too, without waiting for any other question between the parties and the finalization of the proceedings, then the Twenty-seventh, Rule 6, The CPC's delivery will lose significance, defendants' appeal is granted, and the trial is set to go to trial court.
