Find a Lawyer

MST. ROBIA AYUB versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF EDUCATION

Clause 10 Claims for Permanent Absorption of a Government Employee Against the Position of a Detention Wedlock Policy Jurisdiction The accuracy of the basis of marriage policy depends on the employment of services of an employee in the public interest and the lending authorities There is a contractual agreement between the borrower and the lending authorities for services against a particular post against which representatives cannot claim any right of permanent absorption.

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2013

• JAMEELA PIRZADA v. MUHAMMAD ALI SHEIKH 2013 MLD 877
• AMJAD ALI v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary of Ministry of Finance 2013 PLC(CS) 880
• TAMRAIZ JAVAID MASIH v. State 2013 MLD 888
• INAAM ELAHI NASIR v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN 2013 PLC(CS) 899
• FARID-UD-DIN v. CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD 2013 MLD 935
• Maj. Gen Retd. Malik MUHAMMAD FAROOQ v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 2013 PLC(CS) 962
• ZHANGE GUOGEN v. Mst. JAHANZEBA BEGUM 2013 CLC 963
• MUHAMMAD RAMEEZ v. State 2013 YLR 968

All Islamabad judgments of 2013 →

online advocate from Swabi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes