Sections 122 (5A), 122 (9) and 227 (i) of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. VII, R 11 (d) and O XXXIX, RR1, 2 of the Contract Act (I72 of 1872), Sec. Cause Notice issued by the plaintiff under section 122 (9) of the 73rd Special Relief Act (of 1877), Articles 42 and 54 of the Declaration, Permanent Order Prohibition, Compensation and Transfer of Working Interest and Rights in Petroleum Concession Agreement. Has been read under section 122 (5A). ) The plaintiff's Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, demanded that the income tax be payable on such exchange, that the new owner of such interest was liable for the tax owed and the transfer of such interest. 11, CPC, by taxation under OO VII, seeks to dismiss the plaintiff on a charge of withholding by law. The High Court had dismissed the plaintiff's constitutional application before challenging the notice / demand which showed that it was not corrupt, without any jurisdiction or the Supreme Court upheld such decision. ? The court's second constitutional request to suspend such notice / petition was already dismissed by the High Court plaintiff or in favor of the High Court's appeal against the plaintiff's appeal against such notice / demand. Had failed to make a decision or wanted jurisdiction over the Revenue Authority. The Income Tax Appellate Authority was still pending, and they could seek treatment under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 against this decision. The question is whether the interest in doing such work is real estate or real estate, which will be decided by the Inland Revenue Authorities.
