Sections 9 and 7 (4) Punjab Consumer Protection Act (III of 2005), Sections 2 (J) (K), 4 and 26 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), VIII, R 10 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Court Consumer Court In the jurisdiction of the lease finance facility, the defective service / product request for the claimant's return was a leasing company and the defendant was financed by the purchase of a vehicle because of default in installment payments. From, the applicant restored the vehicle and during that time many parts of the vehicle respondents filed a case before the consumer court alleging that the rigging The complainant has rendered it defective product and defective services under which the applicant bank took the jurisdiction of the consumer court whose application was dismissed. For this reason, no claim for defective service can be raised by the claimant. The applicant did not accept any responsibility for providing direct nexus services or leased vehicle services the defendant claimed was the applicant's own position as the applicant. Failed to fulfill his duty as a consumer when he failed to take reasonable care of the vehicle, on which the applicant legally restored the inventory because some parts were allegedly replaced or The stolen defendant's claim was based on a lease agreement between the parties and him. The failure of the applicant bank to fulfill its obligation to keep the vehicle safe has led to prosecution when the respondents' case was referred to the financial institutions (Financial Aid B).
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
