Find a Lawyer

FAYYAZ HUSSAIN versus STATE

Article 133, 435 and 439 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Reviewing the Constitutional Appeal, Interference of the Court Under Constitutional Jurisdiction The High Court, Scope Magistrate, dismissed the petitioner's request for termination of dismissal. It was claimed that the defendants owned the property. The petitioners claimed that the matter was a proportional matter, that the finding of the jurisdiction amended by the jurisdiction of the court before the Civil Court could not be referred to the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution. Removed due to non-constitutional request

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015

• Haji ZAHID SAEED v. ASIF BROTHERS 2015 CLC 183
• COCA-COLA BEVERAGES PAKISTAN LIMITED v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary Labour and Manpower Department, Lahore 2015 PLC 186
• Mst. GHULAM SAKINA v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through District Officer (Rev.) 2015 MLD 188
• FAZAL-E-HAQ v. State 2015 PCrLJ 189
• ASKARI LEASING LTD. v. PRESIDING OFFICER 2015 CLD 196
• GHULAM HUSSAIN v. State 2015 PCrLJ 197
• PAKISTAN MOBILE COMMUNICATION LTD. v. JUDGE DISTRICT CONSUMER COURT, GUJRANWALA 2015 PLD 204
• AZEEM MUBASHAR v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE DASKA 2015 YLR 206

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2015 →

female advocates from Chohar Jamali lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes